FORBIDDEN MEDIA QUESTIONS? It takes a million lies to cover up the truth; however, it only takes a single truth to dismantle a million lies. -Alejandro C. Estrada-
This article aims to educate the public about the forbidden questions that the compliant media cartel refuses to address regarding the Trump-Russian collusion hoax.
For the last six years, the media have been conducting a deception, disinformation, and suppression campaign by publishing stories after stories based on hearsay, gossip, rumors, innuendos, and unverified information from anonymous sources as facts to deceive the public to hide the search for the truth.
The media ignored the biggest corruption scandal in U.S. history, the Hillary-DNC-Obama-Biden conspiratorial plan to destroy Trump. Instead, the media created an illusion to deceive the public that Trump, MAGA supporters, and republicans are a threat to our democracy with no supporting evidence. The media exposed their complicity in the corruption scandal by abandoning all journalistic standards and ethics in taking direction from the Obama and Biden administrations and the Democratic party in promoting the Trump Russian hoax.
The Durham investigation has exposed how corrupted our system of government has become. It has shown how our National Security agencies have been used against its citizenry as part of a nefarious conspiratorial plan at the highest levels of government to interfere with two Presidential elections in 2016 and 2020 and obstruct a Presidency.
We are observing right in front of our eyes the criminalization of political differences and the total disregard for the Rule of law. Yet, the media has failed to expose the lawlessness, which begs for public discussion.
Obtaining answers to the forbidden questions will expose how systemic the governmental corruption problem is. Answers would provide the next Congress the pathway forward in the search for the truth of ridding the nation of this cancer culture of corruption, holding those accountable and restoring the Rule of Law and the public trust in our institutions.
Here are the forbidden media questions that need to be asked and answered:
RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE
The Mueller report stated the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in a sweeping and systematic fashion.
The questions are:
If the Russians were such a threat to our electoral process, as documented in the Mueller report, why, in March 2016, did President Obama shut down the C.I.A. unit strategic Foreign Denial and Deception Committee (FDDC), the unit responsible for countering the Russian disinformation threat that had been operating for over 30 years? 1
[Note: Former FDDC officials believe the shut- down of the FDDC was a deliberate effort by the leadership of the Obama intelligence community to prevent career intelligence officers from mastering how foreign adversaries – mainly Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran – waged denial and deception, and from studying how to detect and counter it.] 2
Why, in August 2016, did President Obama ignore warnings by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the height of increased Russian cyber threats by issuing a stand-down order for U.S. Intelligence agencies to stand down in countering Russian cyber-attacks? 3
[Note: Both the D.O.J. and the F.B.I. told the country that the Russians had interfered in the 2016 election. Yet actions by President Obama of shutting down U.S. countermeasures go against the Russian interference narrative sold to the public by the media, Muller report, Obama and Biden administrations that the Russians were the responsible party.]
FRIENDLY FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SERVICES INVOLVEMENT IN THE TRUMP-RUSSIAN COLLUSION HOAX
The questions are:
Was there election interference by the British government in the 2016 POTUS election?
Was Joseph Mifsud a friendly foreign intelligence service source or a Russian Intelligence source?
The F.B.I. interviewed Mifsud in the lobby of a Washington, D.C. hotel on February 10, 2017. Mifsud admitted to knowing Papadopoulos and having introduced him to two Russians, Polonskaya and Timofeev. But Mifsud denied that he had advanced knowledge that Russia had emails damaging to candidate Clinton. This conflicts with what Papadopoulos told the F.B.I. that he had met Mifsud and that Mifsud told him the Russians had "dirt" on Clinton in the form of "thousands of emails. 4
[Note: The Mueller investigation never followed up on resolving the conflicting statements between Mifsud and Papadopoulos over Russia having Hillary emails and appeared too to drop the matter. Begs the question why?]
In July 2019, Congressional hearings of Robert Mueller Republican Jim Jordan highlighted the curious case of Joseph Mifsud in the Russia-collusion saga, whose name comes up 87 times in Mueller's report, including repeated references to his lying to investigators. When Jordan asks why the F.B.I. didn't charge Mifsud for lying as he did with Michael Flynn, Rick Gates, and Paul Manafort, Mueller can't immediately recall Mifsud or his role. When his memory gets refreshed, Mueller can't explain their decision not to press charges either. 5
[Note: A source said that in 2019, they found two cell phones while searching Mifsud's London apartment. The source claims the authority turned over the two cell phones to Durham and Congressman Nunes. During AG Barr and Durham's fact-finding trip to Italy in October 2019, Mifsud's Lawyer provided a tape to Barr and Durham indicating Mifsud was a western intelligence operative to run an FBI/CIA operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London.] 6
The questions are:
Were Mifsud's cell phones recovered and turned over to Durham?
Were forensics conducted on the phones? If so, does it verify contact between Mifsud and the F.B.I.?
Are there any N.S.A. records that show the connection between Mifsud and the F.B.I.?
Did AG Barr and Durham receive a tape from Mifsud's lawyer verifying that Mifsud is a western intelligence source and confirming Mifsud was part of an FBI/CIA operation to target Papadopoulos?
What were the roles played in the entrapment operations against team Trump members by:
January 26, 2018, an article published in the Observer by John Schindler titled “Dutch Report Reveals Obama Administration Knew About Russian Hacking in Real Time,” reported that the Dutch daily de Volkskrant published a detailed account of the secret spy-games conducted by Western intelligence against Kremlin hackers in the lead-up to our presidential election.
Schindler related in the summer of 2014, hackers working for the 300-person Joint SIGINT Cyber Unit, staffed by the Dutch internal security service or AIVD and the Dutch military’s foreign intelligence service or MIVD, managed to crack into Cozy Bear. Known as APT29 in spy circles, since 2010 the shadowy Cozy Bear has pillaged countless Western governments and businesses with its aggressive hacking. The JSCU’s covert infiltration of Cozy Bear’s headquarters in downtown Moscow represented a stunning intelligence coup.
The Dutch hackers saw everything inside Cozy Bear, which they quickly assessed was a front for Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service or SVR. They monitored not just Cozy Bear activities in real time, they even watched their goings-on by getting control of cameras inside their offices. What JSCU witnessed was damning for Moscow. In November 2014, they observed Cozy Bear operatives hack into the computer networks of the U.S. State Department.
Schindler noted Dutch intelligence notified NSA and in late 2015, the NSA hackers manage to penetrate the mobile devices of several high-ranking Russian intelligence officers. They learn that right before a hacking attack, the Russians search the internet for any news about the oncoming attack. 17
[Note: Schindler article purported that the Five Eyes intelligence network had withheld classified information from Washington out of fears it might travel from the White House to Moscow fearing Trump’s alleged ties to the Kremlin, and their reluctant to share their most valuable secrets with the Americans.
This goes to the heart of the matter of why the Obama administration did so little to counter these nefarious activities of Russian espionage against our 2016 election, was it to protect the special relationship and success of the Five Eyes network ability to penetrated the Russians or was it part of a nefarious plan or combination of both by the Obama administration, IC, FBI, Hillary and the DNC to use Five Eyes SIGNET information from intercepted Russian conversations to taint Trump and members of his team with colluding with the Russians in making the Russians the responsible party in their nefarious false flag disinformation plan to destroy Trump.]
HILLARY CLINTON/DNC FALSE FLAG CONSPIRACY PLAN
The release of the declassification in July 2016, notes of C.I.A. Director Brennan and the September 2016 C.I.A. referral memo to the F.B.I. by the Director of National Intelligence (D.N.I.) confirmed the Russians intercepted a conversation with a Clinton campaign official. The intercepted conversation discussed their false flag conspiracy plan to taint Trump by colluding with the Russians to cover up the Hillary Clinton email scandal. 18
After C.I.A. Director Brennan briefed President Obama on the Russian intercept conversation information; instead of investigating Hillary Clinton and those involved, Director Brennan instructed F.B.I on July 25, 2016. Director Comey opened up four counterintelligence investigations into Trump and the Trump campaign team. In early September 2016, the C.I.A. sent a referral memo to the F.B.I. to look into the allegations of the Clinton D.N.C. disinformation plan but was ignored by the F.B.I. 19
The significance of Brennan's notes and the C.I.A. referral memo to the F.B.I. is that the documents prove the existence of a conspiratorial plan to defraud the American public in the 2016 POTUS election. The documents are documentary evidence proving the conspiratorial agreement establishing a crime under 18 U.S.C. 371, conspiracy to defraud the United States.
The questions are:
Why did C.I.A Director Brennan instruct F.B.I. Director Comey to opened up four investigations on team Trump members in late July 2016 when Brennan and Comey knew the Steele dossier was a paid-for Hillary-DNC disinformation document?
How did the Steele dossier become the centerpiece for U.S. law enforcement investigative and intelligence efforts that launched the F.B.I. investigations that later evolved into the Mueller investigation on Trump and members of his campaign?
MUELLER INVESTIGATION
Steele worked for a law firm that represented Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch who had a business dispute with Manafort.
The questions are:
Why did the Mueller investigation ignore Steele's ties to Deripaska and other Russian Oligarchs with links to the Russian government?
John Podesta and his brother Tony Podesta worked directly with Manafort as lobbyists for Yanukovich. Yet, Mueller indicted Manafort on charges of laundering millions from Yanukovich and charged Manafort with failure to register as a foreign agent. Yet Mueller's team ignored the Podesta brother's relationship with Yanukovich and that they had both failed to register as foreign agents. Moreover, a report by the Government Accountability Institute purported that John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's 2016 election campaign manager, was connected to a Putin-‐- linked Russian government.
Why didn't the Mueller team and the F.B.I. investigate Hillary Clinton and Podesta's ties to Russian oligarchs and government officials?
Instead, Mueller and the F.B.I. ignored their ties to Russian officials in colluding with the Russians and alleged criminal acts of receiving pay-for-play funds from Russians. 20
Mueller's team, who learned early on in their investigation, ignored exculpatory information. Moreover, Mueller team did not find any evidence that the Trump campaign made any effort to follow up with Papadopoulos in pursuing Hillary's missing emails.
LEGAL PREDICATION
The questions are:
What were the legal prediction reasons for the F.B.I. investigations and the justification for the two scope memos by Acting AG Rosenstein for the Mueller investigations?
[Note: Both former AG Barr and Durham put out statements refuting the DOJ/IG conclusion that the F.B.I. investigations were legally predicated. Remember, the F.B.I. told the public the origins of their investigation started with the meeting between Downer and Papadopoulos. It is apparent that the F.B.I. misled the public as to the roots of when their studies began and calls into question the legal predication origins for the Mueller investigation.]
HILLARY CLINTON
The questions are:
Did the D.O.J. & F.B.I. knowingly and willfully hide Hillary Clinton's criminality so she could continue her candidacy?
Did Hillary Clinton compromise U.S. intelligence operations in Libya and damage U.S. National Security by having a highly classified document on her email server? And did the F.B.I. and D.O.J. cover up her criminality so she could run for the Presidency?
[Note: There is an FBI 302 dated June 6, 2016, of an interview of an Intelligence Analyst from the Intelligence community. The Analyst purportedly turned over documents to the F.B.I., alleging that Hillary Clinton compromised U.S. National Security in Libya by having a highly classified document on her email server.] 21
PRESIDENT OBAMA
The questions are:
What did President Obama know, and when did he know about the F.B.I. Crossfire Hurricane investigation and Hillary/D.N.C. plan to influence the 2016 election using a D.N.C. disinformation document?
Why did Obama allow these investigations to go forward if Obama knew this was a plan by the Clinton campaign and D.N.C. to taint Trump with Russian collusion? 22 23
D.O.J. oversight review found that the Obama administration and the F.B.I. were abusing N.S.A. intelligence collection tools in unmasking and spying on American citizens for political purposes. On March 9, 2016, the Department of Justice oversight review discovered outside F.B.I. contractors accessing raw FISA data. However, the findings never disclosed the identity of this private contracting entity.
The questions are:
Who is this unknown private contracting entity, and what did they do with the N.S.A. information they took from the N.S.A.?
Did this private contractor firm have a worksite at D.N.C. law firm Perkins Coie?
F.B.I. admitted since 2012 that they maintain an "F.B.I. workspace" at the Perkins Coy law firm, and Attorney Michael Sussmann was in charge of this F.B.I. workspace. [Note: Jake Sullivan, Susan Rice, and Samantha Powell, who served in the Obama administration and participated in the unmasking of members of Team Trump and promoted the Trump Russian collusion hoax, are now operating in high-level advisor's positions inside the Biden administration.]
See Gov’t Sent. Mem. at 6, United States v. George Papadopoulos, No. 1 :17-cr-182 (D.D.C. Aug. 18, 2017), Doc. 44.
https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2019/07/24/jordan-mueller-wasnt-joseph-mifsud-charged-obstruction-n274801
https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/09/ alexander-downer-papadopoulos-tip-fbi/
PART 3: WE CAUGHT THEM: Deep State Operative Don Berlin Presented Bogus Election Dossier to President Trump Before 1-6, Now Jan 6 Committee is Using This to Claim Insurrection and Take Down President Trump (thegatewaypundit.com)
What Did Obama Know and When Did He Know It? - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics & Inspector General Report Proves Obama Was Neck Deep In Russian Hoax – Red Right Daily
[Note: This analysis was created by a former Retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent John Seaman with over 30 years’ experience in the Rule of Law Field who specialized in anti-corruption and establishing Rule of Law programs for both DEA & DOJ. Seaman is the co-author of an article Taliban Include Heroin Kingpins in Leadership - by Gretchen Peters and John Seaman - SpyTalk and author of Ideology and Political Correctness Trump Reality and reference in article The secret story of how America lost the drug war with the Taliban - POLITICOPOLITICOSearchSearchCloseBack ButtonSearch IconFilter Icon ]
I believe it was explained in a prior sub stack reporting by Glen Greenwald referring two prior articles by him how Obama and holder reorganized the national security division back in 2011 in using Security clearance investigation process x as selecting tool for people for DOJ and FBI who think like them
This very complex conspiracy seems beyond the average American to understand or comprehend. Thing is the media is part and parcel to advancing these lies and at some point a whole purge of the government needs to happen. Indictments and trials must occur. This dark chapter will never be closed an the criminals exposed if good men choose to do nothing. Honest investigators need to write detailed accounts of the criminal activities and first of all Hillary needs to be held accountable as the most horrid individual to ever hold public office. The rest are run of the mill bureaucratic game playing creeps. Obama and Biden are traitors.