MOCK GRAND JURY
The release of the FBI files on Crossfire Hurricane exposes the FBI's role in interference in three Presidential elections. This article presents a detailed probable cause case to the American public
TheTrump administration's release of the FBI files on Crossfire Hurricane will enlighten the American public about the significant role the FBI played in interfering with and influencing three Presidential elections: 2016, 2020, and 2024. This revelation is not just crucial, but it has the potential to significantly impact the political landscape, a matter of concern that should engage every politically aware individual.
This article will present a detailed and compelling probable cause case to the American public, who will act as jurors in the 'mock grand jury.' Your role, as a reader, is not just crucial, but also responsible in this process. You are asked to carefully consider the evidence laid out in this article and compare it with that of the information released in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Crossfire Hurricane files.
It will give the reader an experience of what it's like to participate as a juror in a mock setting and see the case evidence of what a real grand jury would see.
The case presentation today is presenting all the evidence known to date in the Crime of the Century, the Russian Hoax Continuing Conspiracy of election interference by the FBI: 2016, 2020, and 2024 Presidential elections to determine if there is enough probable cause for the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) to open a Conspiracy investigation into the origins of the Russian Hoax to the final overt act of the Conspiracy the weaponization of the district courts using Lawfare to undermine the will of the people who elected President Trump in 2024. It underscores the urgent need for a thorough investigation by the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ). The time for action is now, and your participation in this process is significant.
Before we present the evidence, let me give you a crash course on the legal definition of Conspiracy. The robust Federal Conspiracy Statutes are the most excellent tools in law enforcement for dismantling well-organized conspiracies, providing a strong foundation for our investigation.
The United States Congress recognized that to reach the upper echelons of government corruption, those who planned, organized, and implemented a secretive and sinister plan for unlawful purposes needed effective conspiracy laws and the ability to enforce them to counter the threat posed by a well-designed Conspiracy.
The term 'Conspiracy' carries a weight of intrigue and complexity. In the context of the 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential election interference Conspiracy, it denotes a plot so clandestine and intricate that direct evidence of the conspiratorial agreement is often elusive. The U.S. Supreme Court's legal stance is that circumstantial evidence is allowed to prove the existence of a Conspiracy.
Conspiracy, codified in Federal law, is a recognition of a combination of people getting together to commit a specific crime that is more dangerous to the public because it's more likely to succeed.
The Conspiratorial agreement itself does not have to be formal and is legally sufficient to have some concert of action (overt act) in which the parties work together with some standard design and purpose of understanding.
A tacit knowledge of the goal is sufficient. Each party to the Conspiracy is not required to know the number or identity of all the other conspirators or the details of the Conspiracy. The bottom line is that all that is necessary is that each conspirator knows that the enterprise has a broader scope for its success and organization than disclosed by each conspirator's participation in the Conspiracy.
If you look up the definition on the Department of Justice website, the Statute of Limitations for Conspiracy is defined as a continuing offense requiring an overt act to further the Conspiracy. The Statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the last overt act. The Government must prove that the Conspiracy continued into the limitations period. The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiratorial agreement and whether the Conspiracy continues until its purpose has been achieved or abandoned. In this presentation, the statutes of limitations don't expire until 2029, underscoring the importance of this legal concept in our case.
Establishing a venue for a Conspiracy prosecution can lie in any judicial district where an overt act occurs. For presentation purposes, the raid on the Mar-a-logo on August 22, 2022, by the DOJ FBI would allow the Trump DOJ to change the venue for prosecution purposes from the District of Colombia to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) in the interest of Justice preventing jury nullification from a corrupt jury pool and District Court system in the District of Colombia.
The U.S. Conspiracy statutes are not just laws, they are potent law enforcement tools. They hold high-level government conspirators accountable for crimes with profound consequences. Notable instances of such crimes include Watergate, the dismantling of organized crime organizations, transnational criminal organizations, and international drug cartels. The weight of these statutes is felt and reverberates in the magnitude of the crimes they address, underscoring their significance in law enforcement.
The evidence collected by the SC Durham investigation is not just a collection of facts but a revelation of the gravity of the Conspiracy by Hillary Clinton, the Democrat National Committee (DNC), President Obama, and President Biden to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election. These are not just crimes but crimes with significant consequences.
The reader will see the allegations of corruption at the highest levels of Government in the election process so they can determine if the claims of election interference in three Presidential elections, 2016, 2020, and 2024, have merit in meeting the criminal Conspiracy elements under Federal criminal statutes 18 USC 371, Conspiracy to defraud the American public; 18 USC 241 Conspiracy Against Rights; Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law 18 USC 242; and Conspiracy to cause illegal voting, False Information in, and Payments for Registering and Voters. 1
PROSECUTION THEORY OF THE RUSSIAN HOAX CONSPIRACY
In the Special Council (SC) Durham finding report, Sussman Indictment, and Danchenko Indictment, SC Durham meticulously established a prima facie conspiracy case, demonstrating the commission of all elements of the Crime of Conspiracy under 18 USC 371, implicating the Obama Administration's attempt to defraud the American public by interfering in the 2016 Presidential election.
A conspiracy to commit the offense of impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful function of the Executive Branch is a grave matter. It signifies a deliberate attempt to interfere with or obstruct one of its proper government functions by deceit, craft, or trickery, a serious breach of trust and law.
The standards included dishonest services fraud, a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, which is the general conspiracy statute in which two or more people conspire to defraud the United States by depriving another of the intangible right to honest services by interfering in three Presidential elections.
The findings of the Durham report confirmed that the Government had no evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion. The conclusions noted that the Obama administration fabricated the Russian collusion narrative as part of a well-designed conspiracy plan. The Conspiracy plan was initiated by Hillary Clinton and the DNC and approved by Obama and Biden, implicating them in the Crime of the Century, the Conspiracy to destroy a duly elected President by interfering in the 2016 Presidential election.
The Russian Hoax conspiracy was not just a political maneuver but a calculated ploy by the Obama administration, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to deceive the public and undermine the credibility of then Presidential Candidate Trump and his team. This deliberate act, promoted with the aid of a complicit media, underscores the profound legal implications of such actions and the gravity of the deception. It's a betrayal of the highest order and a serious threat to our democratic process.
After Trump was elected President, the Obama administration continued the conspiratorial agreement by establishing the formation of the resistance movement within the Federal Bureaucracy and the weaponization and politicization of the DOJ, FBI, and the Intelligence Community (IC) by weaponizing Lawfare to obstruct Trump Presidency in rigging the 2020 Presidential election. The Biden administration continued the conspiratorial agreement using the Lawfare Stalin-Beria theory of "Show Me the Man, I Will show you the crime," which suggests that a person can be found guilty of a crime not because they have committed it but because they are a political enemy. This theory was used to prevent Trump from running for President in the 2024 election but failed.
PROVING THE CASE-EVIDENCE SUMMARY ESTABLISHES THE CRITICAL ELEMENT OF THE CONSPIRATORIAL AGREEMENT
In June 2015, the FBI targeted Donald Trump after he announced his presidential campaign. The FBI investigation started an off-the-books operation ordered by FBI Director James B. Comey, which predated the Crossfire Hurricane operation. That two unnamed female FBI undercover agents were directed to infiltrate Trump's 2016 campaign and act as 'honeypots' while traveling with Trump and his campaign, setting the stage for the subsequent events.
In April 2016, Susan Rice, Obama's National Security adviser, FBI Director Comey, James Clapper, NDI, and AG Lynch purportedly met in the White House to discuss the Trump Team appointments of Page, Manafort, Flynn, and Papadopoulos.
On April 1, 2016, FBI Headquarters directed the FBI/New York Division to open a Counterintelligence investigation on Carter Page, knowing that Page was a CIA asset.
In April 2016, CIA Director Brennan set up two Counterintelligence fusion cells, one at the CIA and the other at the FBI, targeting Page, Manafort, Flynn, and Papadopoulos.
These revelations corroborate that the Obama administration's FBI and CIA began investigating Trump and his team members in April 2016, using classified, unverified intercepts of Russian officials from the British Intelligence Service as the basis for their intelligence probes into the Trump campaign in creating the illusion that the Russians were the responsible party.
The FBI lied to the public when it said the origins of its Crossfire Hurricane investigation began in May 2016 with a meeting between Alexander Downer, the Australian Ambassador to the United Kingdom, and George Papadopoulos in a London bar.
In the summer of 2016, GCHQ's then-head, Robert Hannigan, passed highly sensitive material to the CIA chief, John Brennan. This material indicated that the Russians had intercepted a plan by Hillary Clinton and the DNC to taint Trump with Russian Collusion. The GCHQ's actions were significant as they marked the beginning of a series of events that led to a major inter-agency investigation into members of Team Trump rather than into Hillary Clinton and the DNC's actions, as initially suggested.
CIA Director Brennan played a pivotal role in the alleged Conspiracy. He briefed President Obama on the Russian intercept conversation, and instead of investigating Hillary Clinton and those involved, Director Brennan asked FBI Director Comey on July 25, 2016, to open up four counterintelligence investigations into Trump and Trump's campaign team. President Obama's knowledge implicates him in the alleged criminal scheme by the Clinton campaign and DNC to interfere in the 2016 election by tainting Trump with Russian Collusion. The documentary evidence is the Electronic Communication (EC) record from CIA Brennan to FBI Director Comey and the FBI's internal text messages.
On October 6, 2020, former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe declassified handwritten notes of CIA Director John Brennan.
The document corroborates the evidence of Hillary Clinton's and the DNC's conspiracy plan to interfere in the 2016 Presidential election. The declassified note says, "alleges Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016, of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security service." The declassified documents revealed that former CIA Director John Brennan briefed former President Obama on Hillary Clinton's purported "plan" to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as "a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server" ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
In early September 2016, the CIA sent a referral memo to the FBI to look into the allegations of the Clinton DNC Conspiracy plan, but the FBI ignored it.
CIA Director Brennan's notes and the CIA referral memo to the FBI are significant because they prove the existence of a conspiratorial plan by Hillary Clinton/DNC to defraud the American public in the 2016 POTUS election. Therefore, the records are documentary evidence confirming the critical element of the conspiratorial agreement establishing a crime under 18 USC 371, Conspiracy, to defraud the United States by interfering in the 2016 Presidential election.
In April 2016, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) commissioned the Steele dossier, which was paid for by Clinton law firm Perkins Coie and a lawyer representing the DNC named Marc C. Elias. The firm received between 9.2-12,4 million dollars in legal and consulting fees, of which 1.02 million was paid to Fusion GPS and its founder, Glen Simpson, for opposition research on Donald Trump, his family, businesses, and associations. Simpson hired ex-British M16 spy Christopher Steele to gather opposition research on Candidate Trump, and Hillary's Campaign paid for Neille Orhs's four proto dossiers. Fusion GPS became the tip of the spear in promoting the Ohr proto dossiers and the Steele dossier to the public.
Christopher Steele testified on March 17-18, 2020, during a civil defamation lawsuit deposition in a British Court brought by the owner of Alfa-Bank Aleksej Gubarev, a Russian tech executive, that he (Steele) had met the lawyers for the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, Perkins Coie partners, Michael Sussman and Marc Elias. Steele said that Sussman gave him the now de-bunked tip that a Russian bank had a secret communication channel with the Trump organization. Steele said Elias was behind the adjoining room door, listening to Sussman tell him (Steele) about the tip.
Steele testified that the Alfa Bank tip from Elias and Sussman resulted in Steele publishing a memo on September 14, 2016, accusing the Alfa Bank founders of having illicit ties to Vladimir Putin. Steele also testified that Glenn Simpson, founder of GPS, indicated to him that Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice (President Obama's NSA) knew about the dossier.
Steele testified that in August 2016, he received a call from the President of the Brookings Institution, Strobe Talbott, asking Steele about his anti-Trump project. Talbott served as Deputy Secretary of State under President Clinton and on the State Department's Foreign Affairs advisory board during Hillary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State.
Steele stated that he telephoned Talbott on November 2 or 3, 2016, during which Talbott asked Steele for copies of the dossier to discuss with Secretary of State John Kerry and other officials at the State Department. Fusion GPS provided Talbott with a copy of the dossier.
In Steele's testimony in the defamation case, Steele claimed that President Obama's National Security Advisor Susan Rice or Victoria Nuland, Obama's Assistant Secretary of State, briefed Talbott. Steele testified that both Rice and Nuland were colleagues of Talbott at the Brookings Institution.
Steele testified that Talbott was a Russian expert who had been out of the Government for 15 years and that Talbott had been speaking to Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland and Secretary of State John Kerry. [Note: National Security Advisor Rice denied Steele's claim and said it was "Utterly and completely false," Nuland declined to comment. Nuland was the person who approved the July 5, 2016, meeting between Steele and an FBI agent. Nuland testified that she saw the dossier in mid-July 2016. Steele testified that he understood both the FBI and State Department had been discussing the information in the dossier "from the get-go."]
A defamation attorney, Hugh Tomlinson, claimed Sir Andrew Wood, former British Ambassador, telephoned Talbott on November 2nd or 3rd, 2016.
In Durham's indictment of Sussmann, Durham referred to an email from Talbott and noted he spoke to Wood. Wood proves significant as he meets with the late Senator John McCain and McCain Assistant Director of McCain Institute David Kramer and briefs both on the dossier. Kramer flies to London and meets with Steele. The next day after meeting Steele, Kramer flies back to the United States, meets with Fusion GPS, and provides a copy of the dossier to give to McCain. McCain passes the dossier to FBI Director Comey.
On November 12, 2016, Steele wrote to Brookings Institution President Talbott about the dossier: "Dear Strobe, I know this is not straightforward, but we need to discuss the package we delivered to you the other week, and the sooner, the better. What you thought of it, what did you do with it, how we (both) should handle it, and the issues it highlights going forward, etc."
Steele testified that he had destroyed all the documents and communications regarding meetings with the dossier's main source, lawyers from the DNC, Hillary Campaign, and Fusion GPS, in December 2016 and January 2017.
THE MODUS OPERANDI OR THE MEANS OF THE CONSPIRATORIAL AGREEMENT SCHEME
Durham, in his court filing and final report, describes the modus operandi or the means of the conspiracy plan of how the Clinton campaign and DNC lawyers Michael Sussman and Marc Elias implemented the criminal conspiracy scheme:
SC Durham In furtherance of this scheme, Durham states the evidence will show:
This "joint venture" – what is also called a conspiracy – continued into August 2016, where:
In SC Durham's court findings, the details in Sussman's indictment show documentary evidence (payment records) that the Hillary Clinton campaign directly funded and ordered its lawyer Marc Ellis at Perkins Coie to orchestrate a criminal enterprise to fabricate a connection between President Trump and Russia."
On August 12, 2016, Elias, Sussmann, Rodney Joffe, and co-founder of Fusion GPS Fritsch, "agents of the Clinton Campaign," met at Mark Elias's Perkins Coie office, where they discussed the same Alfa Bank allegations that Sussmann would give to the FBI. "The evidence will show that at the meeting, the parties agreed to conduct work in the hope that it would benefit the Clinton Campaign, namely, gathering and disseminating purportedly derogatory data regarding Trump and his associates' internet activities." Billing records confirm that the meeting was billed to the Clinton Campaign.
The conspirators used the information to further the Conspiracy by manufacturing evidence that Trump and his team members had committed crimes.
Durham Indictment alleged that Sussman provided manipulated data that there was the existence of a secret communication channel between the Trump organization and the Russian Alfa Bank of suspicious DNS lookups by Trump Tower, Trump's residential apartment building, and the Executive Office of the President at the White House and a healthcare provider, of internet protocol or IP addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provided.
After meeting with the FBI, Sussman met with the CIA and told the CIA that these lookups demonstrated that Trump and his associates were using Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations, implying Trump and Trump's team were comprising National Security.
Sussman obtained this data from a Tech Executive Rodney Joffe, whose internet company had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the Executive Office of the President (EOP) as part of a sensitive arrangement wherein Joffe internet company provided DNS resolution services to the EOP wherein Joffe and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the nefarious purpose (spying) of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.
SC Durham's final report lays out the dots connecting Elias and Sussman to the Clinton Campaign, Sussman to Joffe using multiple internet companies, and two federally funded university researchers with a complicit media in deceiving and defrauding the American public to interfere in the 2016 POTUS election and to obstruct the Trump Presidency.
In the two indictments, SC Durham meticulously documented the 'means' of interfering with or obstructing by deceit, craft, or trickery. The conspirators knowingly used the Shearer memo dossier and the Steele Dossier, which were manipulated to deceive the American people, an apparent betrayal of trust.
SC Durham court filings and media reports conveyed the roles of two Democratic party-political operatives called "fixers" who had long ties to the Clintons, Cody Shearer and Charles Dolan, and were part of the Brooking Institute, a Democratic party think tank.
In October 2016, Steele provided a copy of the Cody Shearer memo to the FBI that he had received from Jonathan Winer, then a State Department official about Trump and Russia. The memo was written by Cody Shearer, a political operative for the DNC known as a fixer who was friends with Hillary and Bill Clinton. Shearer gave the memo to Clinton's confidant, Sidney Blumenthal, who transmitted it to Jonathan Winer. The memo claimed that a source inside the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) spy agency alleged that Trump had financial ties to influential Russians and that the FSB had evidence of him engaging in compromising personal behavior (Steele Pee tape dossier.)
SC Durham filings told how Shearer and Dolan manufactured disinformation of Trump-Russian Collusion and how they conspired with the Brooking Institute in disseminating the false narrative to the State Department, media, and other Federal agencies to defraud and deceive the American public.
The 'means' also included dishonest services fraud. The conspirators deliberately falsified FISA applications, lied to the FISC, withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense counsel and the court, manufactured crimes, and leaked classified and sensitive information to the media in furtherance of the Conspiracy to defraud the public and obstruct the Presidency.
WITHHOLDING OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE
SC Mueller team withheld exculpatory information from defense lawyers and the court when they learned early on in their investigation that the Trump campaign never showed any interest in George Papadopoulos's alleged offer from Mifsud to retrieve Hillary Clinton's missing emails from the Russians or found any evidence that the Trump campaign made any effort to follow up with Papadopoulos in pursuing Hillary's missing emails.
Failure of FBI/DOJ in releasing exculpatory information FBI case notes and DOJ memos to General Flynn’s court and defense counsel before General Flynn entered a guilty plea. The handwritten notes written by the FBI's former head of counterintelligence, Bill Priestap, after a meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey and then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, where the "FBI discussed interviewing Michael Flynn 'to get him to lie' and 'get him fired. ' The handwritten notes show that the FBI discussed interviewing Michael Flynn' to get him to lie' and 'get him fired."
AG William Barr and FBI Director Christopher Wray's failure to handle the Hunter Biden Laptop, which was in the DOJ's possession in December 2019, is a cause for concern. They failed to inform Mr. Trump's impeachment attorneys of the exculpatory evidence, raising questions about handling evidence in such high-profile cases.
MANUFACTURED STEELE DOSSIER THAT TRUMP WAS PUPPET FOR PUTIN
The Durham report showed that the information for the bogus Steele dossier was a Clinton-DNC paid-for disinformation dossier that originated from associates within the Clinton and DNC orbits, not the Russians, as part of their Machiavellian plan of making the Russians the responsible party to hide their criminality in framing Trump and his team for crimes they didn't commit.
SC Durham, in his findings, proved how the Steele dossier was invented out of whole cloth and consisted almost entirely of rumors, innuendo, and outright falsehoods fabricated by Russian "sources." Durham, in his findings, described how former Brookings Institution policy analyst Igor Danchenko, a Russian national on Steele's payroll, had been under investigation by the FBI for espionage; Olga Galkina, a Cyprus-based Russian national who was a press secretary to a Russian tech company living in Cyprus; having ambitions of joining the State Department under Hillary Clinton if Hillary won the presidential election; and Democratic National Committee (DNC) operative Charles Dolan who had lengthy ties to the Democratic Party and was a registered agent for the Russian Government.
THE FISA WARRANT ABUSE BY THE FBI
Former FBI Lawyer Kevin Clinesmith's guilty plea for altering an email from the CIA about former Trump Campaign Advisor Carter Page is a stark example of deceit and betrayal. The modified information was used in the FISA warrant renewal applications, further undermining the integrity of the investigation and leaving a bitter taste of betrayal in the mouths of the American people.
The FISA warrant abuse, a deceitful and blatant act of deception by the FBI, was used to spy on Trump and his team, a clear violation of their rights and a gross misuse of power that should outrage every American.
The unjust treatment of General Flynn by the FBI is a clear example of the abuse of power and the lack of justice in the system.
Documentary evidence includes handwritten notes written by the FBI's former head of counterintelligence, Bill Priestap, after a meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey and then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, where the "FBI discussed interviewing Michael Flynn 'to get him to lie' and 'get him fired. 'The handwritten notes show that the FBI discussed interviewing Michael Flynn' to get him to lie' and 'get him fired."
Additionally, the handwritten notes by the FBI's former head of counterintelligence, Bill Priestap, after a meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey and then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, suggested that agents planned in the alternative to get Flynn "to admit to breaking the Logan Act" when he spoke to then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition period. The Logan Act is an obscure statute that has never been used in a criminal prosecution. The law was enacted in 1799 to prevent individuals from falsely claiming to represent the United States government abroad.
The notes reveal senior bureau officials engaged in internal discussions about their intentions when interviewing then-national security adviser Michael Flynn in the White House in January 2017. They openly questioned whether their 'goal' was 'to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired.' This candid internal dialogue sheds light on the potential motives behind the FBI's actions, providing insight into their decision-making process.
On January 4, 2017, the FBI Crossfire Razor team cleared Flynn of counterintelligence suspicions and briefed the FBI leadership. However, Peter Strzok instructed the team to keep the case open.
On January 5, 2017, the IC leadership, including Clapper, Rogers, Brennan, and Comey, briefed President Obama and his National Security team, including Sally Yates, Ben Rhodes, and Colin Kahl, who represented the Biden team. After this meeting, President Obama asked James Comey and Sally Yates to remain, and according to recently released HPSCI testimony by Sally Yates, she was surprised to learn that President Obama was aware of the Flynn Kislyak phone call and asked them to look into a Logan Act violation. Yates' HPSCI testimony confirms the notes of the FBI leadership's discussion of using the Logan Act to prosecute Flynn.
Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok NOTES confirm the discussion at the white house meeting on January 5, 2017:
Barack Obama, James Comey, Sally Yates, Joe Biden, and Susan Rice in the Oval Office on January 5, 2017,
Joe Biden (suggesting) the "Logan Act."
Barack Obama: "Have the right people on" Flynn.
James Comey: The Flynn/Kislyak calls "appear legit."
Its documentary evidence Barack Obama personally authorized the framing of General Flynn with a manufactured crime.
AUSA Jensen's review of Flynn's case file, contrary to claims by Mueller's office that Flynn had lied about discussing financial sanctions against Russia during post-election phone calls with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergei Kislyak, showed that the declassified transcripts of those conversations cleared Flynn of any wrongdoing and confirmed that Flynn spoke to Kislyak only about expulsions of Russian diplomats and that the two men never discussed financial sanctions against Russia that the Obama administration had previously levied.
FBI TEXTS SHOWING PRESIDENT OBAMA KNOWLEDGE OF FBI OPERATION CROSSFIRE HURRICANE
The DOJ IG's December 2019 report referenced and quoted the EC's December report on FISA abuse targeting President Trump and Carter Page. The IG report, FBI texts, and testimony show that President Obama was aware of Crossfire Hurricane.
9:41 a.m., Strzok to Lisa Page: "Check out my 9:30 mtg on the 7th."
9:42 a.m., Lisa Page to Strzok: "I can tell you why you're having that meeting."
9:42 a.m., Lisa Page to Strzok: "It's not what you think."
9:49 a.m., Strzok to Lisa Page: "TPs [Talking Points] for D [Director]?"
9:50 a.m., Lisa Page to Strzok: "Yes, be POTUS wants to know everything we are doing."
Page 77 of the report shows that by late July 2016, Obama was briefed by "another US Government agency." [Note: On July 28, 2016, CIA Director John Brennan briefed former President Obama on Hillary Clinton's purported "plan" to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia.]
Judicial Watch also received productions of 171 pages and 119 pages of Strzok-Page emails showing the FBI pushed stories to the media to stoke its claim that the bureau was "highly confident" Russia was "behind recent hacks." One email shows Strzok telling Page about an appearance on CNN by then-Assistant Attorney General for National Security John Carlin: "On CNN now talking about the hacking of state election systems. NICE coordination NSD…."
The emails also show Strzok, Page, and other high-ranking FBI officials discussing the "alleged destruction of laptops," a lengthy discussion about how to respond to a reporter's inquiry into an alleged quid pro quo related to Hillary Clinton's emails in which the State Department would create additional FBI overseas positions; and Strzok defending Director James Comey after a former FBI official said Comey had "thrown all the agents under the bus." "The documents further confirm that Strzok pushed Russia smears of Trump laundered through the Steele dossier.
August 15, 2016, Strzok texts Page, "I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's (McCabe) office-that there no way he (Trump)gets elected-but I'm afraid we can't take that risk, "It's like a life insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40." [Note: Strzok was spearheading both the Clinton email inquiry and the Trump-Russian probe and having an affair with Page, assigned to Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's office.]
Strzok-Page text messages, including one from Page that says, "Potus wants to know everything we're doing." POTUS—an acronym for President of the United States—was Barack Obama on September 2, 2016, when the text was sent from Lisa Page to Peter Strzok.
On November 9, 2016, the day after Trump's victory, FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page exchanged texts referring to a "secret society. "Page texted Strzok, saying, "Maybe this should be the first meeting of the Secret Society."
Strzok responded to Page, "Too hard to explain here. Election-related." The next day, Strzok texted Page, "Bill [Priestap, head of FBI Counterintelligence] just sent a two-hour invite to talk strategy.
CONTINUATION OF THE RUSSIA HOAX CONSPIRACY - FABRICATION OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT (ICA)
The fabrication of the Intelligence Community Assessment was a pivotal moment in the Obama administration's deceptive efforts to undermine the Trump presidency. This document, which was used to promote the Trump-Russian collusion hoax, was a key tool in the betrayal of the American people's trust, forming a resistance movement led by President Obama.
The Obama administration and the media promoted the ICA findings that all 17 U.S. Intelligence agencies concurred when only two agencies reached a concurrence: the FBI and the CIA. This gave the press reporting the appearance of legitimacy that the allegations had merit. In addition, the Obama administration leaked the Steele dossier to the press, which circulated to promote the Trump-Russian hoax that the Trump presidency was illegitimate.
The sworn testimony of John Brennan to Gang-of-Eight on May 23, 2017, stated, "Again, in consultation with the White House, I PERSONALLY briefed the full details of our understanding of Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership; specifically: Senators Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein, and Richard Burr; and to representatives Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Devin Nunes, and Adam Schiff between August 11 and September 6 [2016], I provided the same briefing to each of the gang of eight members."
Brennan goes on to testify that the primary substance of those 2016 Gang of Eight briefings was the same as the leading judgments of January 2017 classified and unclassified intelligence assessments published by the CIA, FBI, DNI, and NSA, "The Intelligence Community Assessment" (ICA).
Brennan also received information from within the Steele Dossier, which he put into President Obama's Daily Briefing and shared with the Gang of Eight.
CIA Director John Brennan briefed Harry Reid on the Steele dossier in August 2016, even before the Dossier reached the FBI. However, John Brennan denied seeing the Dossier until December 2016—a transparent lie.
A source close to the House investigation said Brennan himself selected the CIA and FBI analysts who worked on the ICA and that they included former FBI counterespionage chief Peter Strzok. "Strzok was the intermediary between Brennan and former FBI Director Comey, and he was one of the authors of the ICA," according to the source."
On December 15, 2016, Strzok and Page texted each other about a sister organization leaking to the mainstream media. The next day, December 16, Strzok texted Page again, this time to discuss an article in The Washington Post: "FBI in agreement with CIA that Russia aimed to help Trump win White House," where Strzok argued that the Central Intelligence Agency is more capable of manipulating the press and that the Federal Bureau of Investigation had the initial position, not the Central Intelligence Agency…
FBI Comey and McCabe said President Obama wanted all FBI information on the Steele Dossier included in the ICA, so the FBI pushed for its inclusion in the ICA's body. CIA Director Brennan disagreed, leaving the Dossier out of the report instead of being put into Annex A of the ICA.
Conflicting testimony by CIA Director Brennan has sworn the Dossier was not "in any way" used as a basis for the ICA, which conflicts with NSA Director Rogers's testimony. Rogers stated that the Dossier was "added" as an "appendix to the ICA draft" and that consideration of that appendix was "part of the overall ICA review/approval process." That the Dossier did factor in, Rogers has testified that while he was sure the Russians wanted to hurt Clinton, he wasn't as confident as CIA and FBI officials in their assessments designed to help Trump, explaining that such an assessment "didn't have the same level of sourcing and the same level of multiple sources."
CIA Director John Ratcliffe said in written testimony that the underlying evidence doesn't support former Obama Administration CIA Director John Brennan's conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 Presidential election to help Trump win. This revelation confirms the conspiratorial agreement of the plot to destroy Trump by interfering in a Presidential Election to deceive the American people.
President Obama formed a resistance movement of loyalists inside the Federal government (DOJ/FBI/CIA) to obstruct the Trump presidency by promoting the Trump-Russian collusion hoax with complicit media to block the Trump Presidency.
Former top Obama officials Clapper, Powers, Rice, Rhoades, and Farkus, who swore under oath before the House Intelligence Committee, acknowledged they had no 'empirical evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia in the 2016 election. Yet, for the last seven years, these same former Obama administration officials promoted the manufactured Russian false flag collusion hoax, deceiving the public and betraying their trust, all overt acts in furtherance of the Conspiracy.
Daniel J. Jones, the founder of an investigative outfit called the Penn Quarter Group (PQG) and former aide to deceased Senator Feinstein, told the FBI in March of 2017 that he had retained the services of Fusion GPS. and Christopher Steele to "continue exposing Russian interference" in the 2016 election. Steele is the former British spy who authored the infamous unverified Dossier of allegations against President Donald Trump.
Mr. Sean Jones told agents that his firm had acquired $50 million from seven to 10 'wealthy donors' to hire Mr. Steele and Fusion GPS to continue investigating Mr. Trump and his ties to Russia. This alleged funding from wealthy donors, including George Soros, is a stark example of the unjust financial power being used to undermine the Trump presidency, invoking a sense of outrage in the public arena.
CONTINUATION OF THE RUSSIA HOAX CONSPIRACY - ELECTION INTERFERENCE IN THE 2020 POTUS ELECTION
Time magazine's February 15, 2021, cover story pulls back the curtain on a "conspiracy" among a "well-funded cabal of powerful people" in an "extraordinary shadow effort" that successfully pushed Trump from office.
Michael J. Morell Obama, former Acting CIA Director, provides stunning evidence that the now-infamous letter from 51 security officials in October 2020 was not an organic intelligence community event but rather a scheme blaming the Russians for helping Biden win the 2020 POTUS election.
In a sworn statement, Former Obama CIA Director Morell implicated Tony Blinken, a former Obama official and current Secretary of State for the Biden Administration.
Morell stated that Blinken was behind orchestrating the disinformation letter from the 51 Intelligence officials on behalf of Biden's presidential campaign that prompted the infamous letter in which Morell and 50 fellow former intelligence officials falsely claimed that material from Hunter Biden's laptop published by The New York Post before the 2020 election was Russian disinformation. This admission by Morrell is a key piece of evidence (overt act) in deceiving the public in furtherance and continuation of the 2016 conspiratorial agreement by interfering in the 2020 POTUS Election to destroy Trump.
These 51 former intelligence officials, with full knowledge and intent, abused their former National Security positions and the public trust to deceive the American public. Their actions significantly impacted the 2020 POTUS election, influencing voters to vote for Biden over Trump. A Media Research Center poll illustrated this, showing that 45.1% of Biden voters were unaware of the laptop story, and 16% admitted that had they known, they would not have voted for Biden. This deceitful manipulation of information is a stark betrayal of the American public's trust.
The contents of Morrel's email to CIA Director Brennan speak for themselves. In it, Morrel asked Brennan if he (Morrel) could facilitate the overthrow of the United States government during the November 3, 2020, Presidential elections.
On Mon, October 19, 2020, at 9:29 a.m. Michael Morrel emailed John Brennan. Michael Morrel wrote: "Can I add your name to this list?
Will l be adding Leon, Sue Gordon, Jeh Johnson, George, Lisa Monaco, and Mike Rogers (DIRNSA) today.
I am working on adding Dan Coats, Mike Rogers (HPSCI), and Tom Bossert. And lots of other IC career folk. Trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue. Thanks. Michael
From: John Brennan Date: Mon, October 19, 2020, at 9:47 a.m. Subject: Re: Letter to Sign To: Michael M Morrel, Brennan wrote "Ok, Michael, add my name to the list. Good initiative. Thanks for asking me to sign on.
This documentary evidence confirms the continuation of the 2016 conspiratorial agreement by interfering in the 2020 Presidential election.
The FBI, during the 2020 election, contacted both Twitter and Facebook and falsely warned both companies that the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation when available evidence proved that there was an actual laptop computer belonging to Biden's son Hunter. The FBI demanded that Twitter and Facebook censor any social media reports or data from Hunter's laptop. This censorship resulted in a reputable news agency, the New York Post, story of Hunter Biden's laptop being edited and suppressed from the American public. The effects of both Twitter and Facebook banning the Hunter Biden laptop story at the recommendation of the FBI resulted in the election swinging to Biden over Trump, implicating the FBI in inferencing in a POTUS election, which is a blatant violation of the law and a grave injustice.
The Twitter file releases corroborated the allegations by Time magazine of rigging the 2020 Presidential election by a well-funded cabal of influential people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage, and control the flow of information. The Twitter files, a collection of internal documents from Twitter, illustrated a convergence of 'Big Brother' Government, media, and big tech in a well-designed Machiavellian conspiracy plan to destroy Trump and interfere in Presidential elections. First, to control what the American public hears and reads to advance a Leninist ideology where conformity and authoritarian tyrannical Government become the new normal.
The importance of the Twitter files is that its additional evidence (overt acts) proves a pattern of Conspiracy in furtherance and continuation of the conspiratorial agreement by Hillary Clinton, DNC, Presidents Obama, and Biden to defraud the American public by interfering in three POTUS elections 2016, 2020 and 2024 to destroy Trump. By implementing a massive disinformation campaign promoting the bogus Clinton/DNC paid-for Steele dossier, conducting illegal surveillance of President Trump and his team, and executing a gigantic social media censorship program encompassing agencies across the Federal Government – from the FBI, DOJ, Department of State (DOS) to the Department of Defense (DOD) Pentagon to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to destroy the Trump Presidency and the Make America Great (MAGA) movement. The impact of this disinformation campaign cannot be overstated, as it has significantly influenced the outcomes of multiple elections.
In a Fox commentary article dated August 27, 2024, Jonathan Turley titled 'Meta CEO Zuckerberg admits he was part of the Biden-Harris censorship scheme. You've been warned, America.' In this article, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is quoted as stating in sworn Congressional testimony and in a letter that his company, Facebook, did yield to pressure from the Biden-Harris administration to censor American citizens on various subjects. Zuckerberg stated, 'I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it."
Norm Eisen, a renowned expert on 'color revolutions, a system employed by US intelligence to overthrow undesirable regimes or political movements, is a figure of significant influence. His expertise in this area is widely acknowledged. Following the 2020 Presidential Election, Eisen proudly shared how he and top Democrats and intelligence experts utilized this model to shift the US election from President Trump in 2020. Eisen admission confirms the story in Time Magazine of a "conspiracy" among a "well-funded cabal of powerful people" in an "extraordinary shadow effort" that successfully pushed Trump from office.
Updated information-Cover up of FBI withholding information from Congress
June 2025, FBI Director Kash Patel has turned over a batch of internal documents to Congress detailing allegations that Chinese operatives sought to interfere in the 2020 election by mass-producing fake U.S. driver’s licenses to facilitate fraudulent mail-in voting. 2
CONTINUATION OF THE RUSSIA HOAX CONSPIRACY - ELECTION INTERFERENCE BY THE FBI IN THE 2024 POTUS ELECTION
During the January 30, 2024, confirmation hearing for Trump's nominee to serve as FBI director, Kash Patel, Senator Grassley revealed the existence of whistleblower disclosures of email records alleging the genesis of the federal election interference case by SC Smith against Trump began at the hands of FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy Thibault.
Senator Grassley, chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senator Ron Johnson, R-Wis., chair of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, shared internal FBI emails and predicted documents legally protected whistleblower disclosures with the public.
One email revealed Thibault communicating with a subordinate agent on February 14, 2022. Thibault said: "Here is the draft opening language we discussed," and attached material that would later become part of Special Counsel Jack Smith's elector case.
Thibault's email, sent on February 24, 2022, to a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, John Crabb, states: "I had a discussion with the case team, and we believe there to be predication to include former President of the United States Donald J. Trump as a predicated subject."
An email dated April 11, 2022, shows Thibault approving the opening of Arctic Frost. The following email, dated April 13, 2022, was from an FBI agent to Thibault stating that the FBI deputy director approved its opening.
The emails are documentary evidence proving Thibault broke FBI protocol by opening an FBI investigation called "Arctic Frost," which played a critical role in advancing the bureau's original investigation related to SC Smith's 2020 election investigation, tying President Trump to the SC Smith probe without sufficient predication.
The fact that both the FBI Crossfire Hurricane and Arctic Frost Investigations were opened without sufficient predication establishes a pattern of Conspiracy proving the FBI attempts to frame President Trump for crimes he didn't commit in furtherance of the conspiratorial agreement of election interference in the 2016, 2020 and 2024 Presidential elections to destroy President Trump.
CONTINUATION OF THE CONSPIRACY -WEAPONIZATION OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM - LAWFARE-
"Lawfare" is a term for using legal systems and principles to achieve a political end. In this case, it refers to the strategic use of lawsuits and legal challenges, often without merit, to obstruct the Trump administration's policies and objectives. This tactic, known as "lawfare," has been used extensively against the Trump administration, and its implications are profound.
Margot Cleveland, a respected legal scholar, has connected the dots in her June 3, 2024, article in "The Federalist," showing the efforts by Biden's DOJ and the New York County (Manhattan) authorities to maliciously construct and execute a court case made of patently false charges against their principal political adversary, Donald Trump, by abusing state and federal law.
On April 23, 2024, Sub Stack author Julie Kelly reported that Judge Cannon unredacted key evidence related to SC Smith's classified documents case against former President Trump. In her sub-stack article, Kelly provided copies of the unredacted documents showing what DOJ/Jack Smith wanted to conceal from the American people as proof of collaboration between the Biden White House and NARA to concoct a case against Trump.
President Joe Biden regrets tapping Merrick Garland to be attorney general. He privately complains that the Department of Justice didn't do enough to prosecute President-elect Donald Trump, people familiar with his comments told The Washington Post. Biden's comment is an admission as it shows his knowledge of Trump's prosecution, implicating Biden in the Conspiracy to destroy Trump by using Lawfare, a term that refers to interfering in the 2024 Presidential election.
Now that the Democrats and their surrogates have no power in the Federal Government as Republicans control the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives, they have resorted to the last desperate measures of using Lawfare by selectively choosing the courts and judges who are perceived to be politically motivated, often referred to as "activist judges," to place holds and freezes on policies that the President wants to enact.
From the moment Donald Trump was sworn into office, a network of activist judges, many of whom were appointed by Democratic presidents, has worked tirelessly to obstruct his policies, undermine his authority, and interfere in the democratic process. Currently, over 170 lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration.
Low-level Federal (U.S. District Court) Judges are overstepping their bounds, inserting themselves into Executive Branch prerogatives and Constitutional responsibilities to obstruct the Trump administration's objectives. This misuse of power is not just a concern; it's a grave injustice. This urgent situation demands our immediate attention, and the intervention of the United States Supreme Court is not just crucial but vital and urgent in this regard. These actions, which are well beyond their generally accepted powers and duties, cannot continue.
Approximately 30 of the 100 lawsuits relate to Trump's immigration policies, while more than 20 of the cases directly challenge the actions of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. Ten of the cases challenge Trump's policies regarding transgender people, and more than 20 cases oppose the President's unilateral changes to federal funding, government hiring, the structure of agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and U.S. National Security and foreign policy of sending Criminal aliens back to their countries of origin.
These actions have led to partisan judges in blue states issuing court orders, hindering President Trump's authority as Chief Executive to root out waste, fraud, and abuse from the Federal Bureaucracy and adversely impacting U.S. National security foreign policy. The urgency of this situation cannot be overstated.
These court rulings by Federal District Court Judges to limit President Trump's authority under Article II set up the Constitutional separation of power crisis, pitting Article Two versus Article Three. Article II addresses the federal Government's executive power, including the President's power as commander in chief. Article III addresses the federal Government's judicial power.
The Constitutional question is, where in the Constitution is it stated that a single district court judge has the Constitutional authority to bind the nation to seize power from the Executive Branch to compel the Executive Branch of Government to comply with their orders that impact the President's ability to carry out his duties as defined under Article II of the Constitution?
The primary concern is that these orders from the U.S. District Courts encroach on constitutional Executive Authority, apparent from a plain reading of the Constitution.
President Trump has stated that he will follow the rule of law. However, when these orders hinder the President from carrying out his agenda promptly, wherein delays adversely impact the nation, it may be time for President Trump to reverse the order of the appellate process in the Federal court system.
These judges, overwhelmingly appointed by Democratic presidents, have systematically weaponized the courts against a sitting president. This can be described as an unconstitutional coup, a serious breach of the democratic process and the rule of law.
Their rulings go beyond legal interpretation and directly violate the Constitution's principles of separation of powers, executive authority, and the rule of law.
It is arguably a continuation of the 2016 Conspiratorial agreement to obstruct the Trump Presidency through the weaponization of the justice system. The actions of these radical activist judges establish a pattern of Conspiracy to obstruct the Trump Presidency, the Trump agenda, and the will of the voters. One of the commonalities that connect the dots is that some of the same people behind the Russian Hoax ruse, the rigging of the 2020 election, are the same people behind the weaponization of the court system, Marc Elias and Norm Eisen.
The facts show that Elias was the main person behind the various lawfare campaigns across the country to target Trump and subvert election results.
For nine years, Norm Eisen has been engaging in anti-Trump Lawfare nationwide. Eisen's group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), attempted to remove Trump from Colorado's ballot in 2024.
Eisen, in a bold move, publicly announced on X that he was taking Elon Musk and Doge to court. His aim? To 'impose consequences' for their attempts to curb fraud and spending in the US government.
Leftwing District Court judges are now exceeding their authority in trying to obstruct President Trump's policies. It was all well planned, and the planning began during the summer, well before the election. From Politico in July 2024 article titled “Democratic lawyers get ready: ‘If Trump wins, there will be chaos”:
"Now, Democratic attorneys around the country are already gearing up for the possibility of a second Trump administration by beginning to map out an aggressive legal strategy to fight him again in court — this time with a fresh sense of urgency.
Democratic attorneys general are exploring hiring outside experts and dispatching staff to study areas of the law anticipated to be attacked, such as reproductive health, immigration, and the environment.
They identify staff members who are best equipped to fight assertions of executive privilege — which Trump invoked in his most high-profile controversies — and states that are best positioned to lead bigger cases.
They are also scrutinizing Project 2025, the 900-page blueprint from The Heritage Foundation that outlines a conservative agenda for the next Republican presidency.
The early but serious preparations acknowledge that a second Trump presidency would entail these lawyers’ filing lawsuit after lawsuit against the Federal Government to mitigate what they view as a significant threat to democracy and individual rights.
In a PBS interview on the "PBS NewsHour, on March 25, 2025" the Senate Minority leader gave away the game plan when he said:
"We did put 235 judges, progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump, last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time.
We hope that the appellate courts will uphold those rulings when they reach the Supreme Court."
"Chuck Schumer admits the quiet part out loud— Democrat-appointed judges are really activists who are there to stop Trump. Schumer's statement is an admission that Leftwing District Court judges are now exceeding their authority in trying to obstruct President Trump's policies.
Lastly, the cover-up by the media and those within the Biden administration, who concealed President Biden's declining mental cognitive state over four years in office after SC Hur determined that Biden was not mentally competent to stand trial in a criminal proceeding, raises serious concerns. It shows how corrupted the system has become at the highest level of government. If Biden was not competent to stand trial, how could he be qualified to make Presidential decisions? This issue of political accountability should deeply concern us all. It is a fitting ending to the Crime of the Century.
The stark reality is that neither SC Durham nor SC Mueller ever delved into the origins of the Obama-Hillary-Biden-DNC plan from the perspective of a Conspiracy. Mueller was merely a puppet for the 18 Democratic-controlled members, particularly Andrew Weisman, who had their sights set on Trump. AG Barr shackled SC Durham's investigative scope, and it was clear that Durham would never stand a chance in the District of Colombia, given the corrupt judges, a prejudiced jury pool that predominantly voted Democrat and the deep-seated animosity towards Trump.
That is why Durham didn't ask the Grand Jury for a conspiracy indictment; he knew no Grand Jury would return an actual bill of indictment. Instead, he was limited to conducting single-focus investigations on Sussmann and Danchenko lying to the FBI, resulting in acquittals. These limitations underscore the need for a more thorough approach.
SC Durham lost both cases because the judges in the Sussman and Danchenko cases excluded key pieces of evidence. The judges deemed the emails and text evidence as hearsay and prejudicial to the defendants. Had Durham indicted them as part of the conspiracy in a conspiracy indictment, the evidence would have been allowed under the conspiracy status.
Both Sussman and Danchenko still have criminal liability. There is a potential for further investigation if AG Bondi opened an investigation into the coup using the pattern of conspiracy theory that this was a continuation conspiracy, as laid out in the sub stacks, showing how the overt acts and commonalities all match up, just like we use in drug cases.
In closing, I hope the information presented shows you that the evidence meets the legal requirements for the Statute of Limitations for Conspiracy as defined as a continuing offense requiring an overt act to further the Conspiracy for the need of the Trump Administration to open up an investigation and complete the investigation by 2029. The Trump administration can keep President Trump's promises of restoring public trust in the Rule of Law and our election system by holding people accountable for violating the law. Their actions in this regard could profoundly impact the future of our democracy. Let's hope they have the political will to do so. 3 4 5
References and Citations
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-923-18-usc-371-conspiracy-defraud-us
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/3444294/fbi-kash-patel-gives-congress-files-alleged-chinese-plot-fake-id-2020-election/
[Note: This analysis was created by a former Retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent John Seaman with over 30 years’ experience conducting complex conspiracy investigations. Seaman is the co-author of an article Taliban Include Heroin Kingpins in Leadership - by Gretchen Peters and John Seaman - SpyTalk and author of Ideology and Political Correctness Trump Reality and reference in article The secret story of how America lost the drug war with the Taliban - POLITICOPOLITICO]
I find your analyses to be spot on...how is it you are not on every alt-media blog that cover these issues? Do you feel that a indictments will happen through the Bondi DOJ? And if so, what's taking so long?