RULE OF JUDGES

This is the final article in a series of 50 detailing what some consider the greatest Conspiracy in U.S. history. It aims to inform American voters about alleged election interference / accountability

Since Trump's election, his administration has faced over 170 lawsuits, a testament to its unwavering resilience in relentless opposition. Despite these legal battles aimed at thwarting the voters' will, Trump's deportation agenda to counter the invasion of 20 million illegals into the U.S. has not been deterred. This resilience, a clear sign of Trump's strong leadership in adversity, should reassure you and instill confidence in his ability to uphold his promises.

The American voter spoke loud and clear in the 2024 Presidential election, returning Trump to power because he promised to restore public faith in the Rule of Law. His commitment to public safety in securing the border and stopping the invasion of over 20 million illegals into our country, a result of Biden's open border policy, reassured the American people and instilled confidence in his leadership.

After Trump took office, his Department of Government Ethics (DOGE) team, led by Elon Musk, conducted a thorough investigation. They uncovered a massive redistribution of wealth and money laundering scheme where billions of U.S. taxpayer's dollars were being doled out in grants and loans by various Federal Agencies to Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) that were paying for these illegal aliens to migrate into America.

DOGE exposed the last part of the ten-year Crime of the Century plan to transform America into a Marxist state by bringing in millions of illegals to overwhelm the safety net system meant for disadvantaged Americans to destroy the American middle class right out of the Saul Alinsky Rules of Radicals playbook in replacement of the Democratic party losing working-class voters with illegals ensuring a majority of voters bloc for Democrats for years to come.

Despite the left and the Biden Administration's efforts to thwart Trump's return to power through Lawfare in the 2024 election, their coordinated manufactured crimes failed. The American people, showing their resilience and hope, saw through the charade and eagerly anticipated a Trump victory in 2024 after Biden withdrew from the race. This anticipation, a clear sign of hope for the future of our country under Trump's leadership, should also fill you with hope.

For the last ten years, this country has been put through hell, and the institutions we thought we trusted have all betrayed us. The pressing question remains: when does transparency become a reality? Where does accountability for those in the Federal Bureaucracy and elected office begin? It's time for us to demand justice and fairness in our Government, a call that resonates with our shared concerns about government ethics and our crucial role in demanding accountability.

We find ourselves straddling two starkly contrasting dimensions: one that holds significance, individuality, God, family, and country, and the other in which a collective mindset of groupthink expressing anger and hatred prevails.

Historically, most countries have a lifespan of only 100 to 200 years. Yet here we are, a nation that has surpassed that, now standing at 275 years. This historical context should prompt us all to pause and reflect on the journey we've been on and the challenges we've overcome.

If America fails and the epitaph is written, the legal profession would bear a significant share of the blame. It was the legal profession that turned a blind eye to the deep-state effort to weaponize and politicalize the tools of the FBI and IC to target and destroy one man, Donald Trump, by manufacturing crimes. Instead of calling out the left attempt by the Obama and Biden administrations of using the Lawfare Stalin-Beria theory of "Show Me the Man, I Will show you the crime," which suggests that a person can be found guilty of a crime not because they have committed it but because they are a political enemy, the Supreme Court condoned it.

After the 2016 election, the Conspiracy movement, a term used to describe the coordinated efforts to undermine the Trump Administration, continued by forming the Resistance Movement. This was a collective term for the groups and individuals who opposed and sought to undermine the Trump Administration within the Federal Bureaucracy to thwart the Trump Agenda. Election interference continued into the 2020 Election, where Democratic Lawyers boosted how they used the color revolutions model, a system employed by U.S. intelligence to overthrow undesirable regimes or political movements, in the 2020 Presidential Election to shift the U.S. election from President Trump in 2020. The Conspiracy of election interference continued with the weaponization of the courts using legal warfare to undermine the will of the people who elected President Trump in 2024.

The sheer volume of documentary evidence is overwhelming. It proves a pattern of Conspiracy by interfering in three presidential elections, confirming the conspiratorial agreement by Obama, Hillary, Biden, and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to stop Trump from enacting his agenda and the will of the American people.

After 100 days in Office, President Trump has shown that Congress didn't need to pass a new law to stop the flood of illegals into our country. All it took was a President who dared to enforce the existing Immigration law. As part of his promises to the 77 million voters who voted for him, he closed the U.S. border and stopped the invasion of illegals in the U.S. This decisive action should make you feel more secure about the future under Trump's leadership.

Now that the Democrats and their surrogates have no power in the Federal Government as Republicans control the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives, they have resorted to the last desperate measures of using Lawfare by selectively choosing the courts and judges who are perceived to be politically motivated, often referred to as "activist judges," to place holds and freezes on policies that the President wants to enact. This plan to obstruct Trump was confirmed in a July 2024 article by Politico titled "Democratic lawyers get ready: "If Trump wins, there will be chaos." The article lays out the details by State Democrat Attorney Generals documenting the plan to obstruct the Trump presidency, which began during the summer of 2024, well before the election.

It is a continuation of the 2016 Conspiratorial agreement to interfere in the 2026 elections by obstructing the Trump administration by weaponizing the Federal court system so the Democrats can use these court rulings for political advantage in deceiving the American public.

There is no longer any doubt that this was a planned overt act playing the lawfare card in Judge shopping in blue judicial districts to find Judges who sympathize with the Democrats in obstructing President Trump in deceiving voters. Trump has no respect for the Rule of law by influencing voters in the 2026 election.

The actions of these radical activist judges establish a pattern of Conspiracy to obstruct the Trump Presidency, the Trump agenda, and the will of the voters. One of the commonalities that connect the dots is some of the same people behind the Russian Hoax ruse, the rigging of the 2020 election, and using Lawfare in the 2024 election are the same people behind the weaponization of the court system, which President Trump, in his remarks, called out Marc Elias and Norm Eisen.

The facts show that Elias was the main person behind the various lawfare campaigns across the country to target Trump and subvert election results. Elias surfaced in the SC Durham report as being the guy who Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee hired who contracted with Fusion GPS to invent the Alfa Bank ruse accusing Trump of a secret connection with Russia's "Steele Dossier."

Norm Eisen and his group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). CREW backed the attempt to kick Trump off Colorado's ballot in 2024, and Eisen's other groups have been engaging in anti-Trump Lawfare nationwide for nine years.

In a PBS interview on the "PBS NewsHour, on March 25, 2025" the Senate Minority leader gave away the conspiratorial game plan to obstruct Trump's Presidency when he said:

"We did put 235 judges, progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump, last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time.

We hope the appellate courts will uphold those rulings when they reach the Supreme Court."

"Chuck Schumer admits the quiet part out loud— Democrat-appointed judges are really activists who are there to stop Trump. Schumer's statement is an admission that Leftwing District Court judges are now exceeding their authority in trying to obstruct President Trump's policies.

These court rulings by Federal District Court Judges to limit President Trump's authority under Article II set up the Constitutional separation of power crisis, pitting Article Two versus Article Three. Article II addresses the federal Government's executive power, including the President's power as commander in chief. Article III addresses the federal Government's judicial power.

The Constitutional question is, where in the Constitution is it stated that a single district court judge has the Constitutional authority to bind the nation to seize power from the Executive Branch to compel the Executive Branch of Government to comply with their orders that impact the President's ability to carry out his duties as defined under Article II of the Constitution?

Instead of dealing with the Constitutional issue of defining the lower court's authority, the Robert Court has created confusion by issuing decisions that exacerbate the current battle between the Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch, as illustrated by the deportation of MS-13 gang member Abrego Garica, an illegal alien from El Salvador who entered the U.S. illegally and was a member of the MS-13 gang, a designated terrorist group.

Garica is the new poster boy and rallies cry for the Democratic party and the left, portraying the false narrative that Garica's due process rights were violated. Democrats want the public to believe Garica, a Maryland family Man who was illegally arrested and deported to El Salvador by the Trump Administration, promoting the narrative that Garica has a right to stay in the country. The court record shows in 2020, Garica's wife filed two complaints to the court asking for restraining orders against Garica by his wife fearing for her life for beating and assaulting her.

The facts show two immigration judges held two due process deportation hearings where both Judges found evidence that Garica was an MS-13 gang member. Both Judges issued orders that Garica be deported. The last order said Garica feared for his life if he returned to El Salvador, from threats from another gang, stating if he returned to El Salvador, a rival gang would kill him, so the court instructed the Government Garica could be deported but not to El Salvador.

Since the deportation court rulings, Garica's claim that he would be harmed by a rival gang is no longer applicable as the rival gang 18th Street gang Garica claimed would kill him no longer exists. For those with common sense, Garica never opposed the Judge's ruling he was an MS-13 member, and the mere fact he claimed he would be killed by a rival gang is an admission he was a member of a gang.

Garica was arrested as part of the Trump Administration's nationwide sweep of MS-13 gang members and other dangerous aliens and deported back to his country of origin. In its court filing, the Trump administration admitted they made a clerical error in deporting Garica to El Salvador but that the Government no longer has control of Garica. The country wouldn't have this conversation if the Biden administration had allowed Garica to be deported. That's how absurd all this has become.

Yet we have two District Court Judges, both with apparent animus for President Trump and conflict of interest issues, misusing their authority to hold President Trump and members of his administration for contempt of court over the deportation of criminal aliens who entered the country illegally. The underlying issue here is an attempt by unethical rogue judges to set up a new system where every illegal gets the same due process hearings as American citizens before District Court Judges, replacing the current due process hearings before Immigration Judges. If successful, it would guarantee that a majority of the 20 million plus illegals let into the country by Biden would never be deported from the country and, at some point, be granted citizenship and voter rights. One has to ask where the courts were when Biden illegally allowed 20 million aliens into the country. Instead of stopping the invasion, the courts allowed the invasion.

Worse, if the Supreme Court limits President Trump's Article II authority to protect the safety of its citizens from criminal gang members in deporting criminal aliens from the U.S., it will turn the U.S into a third-world country of the U.S. become Mexico where criminal gangs will operate with impunity within the country, overwhelming Law Enforcement resources in impacting the safety of its citizens; this is the lefts end goal in destroying America.

On April 19, 2025, the Supreme Court halted all deportations of criminal aliens under the Alien Enemines Act, putting a hold on President Trump's Article 2 authority to deport dangerous criminals members of the Tren de Argua Venezuelan street gang that has been terrorizing American cities and communities from being deported from the U.S. This has now created a Constitutional Crisis of significant proportions. This decision to stay came after the Supreme Court told Judge Boasberg that he did not have jurisdiction over the Alien Enemies Act, and he, with the ACLU, filed an emergency class action TRO to the Supreme Court, resulting in a stay order. Apparently, Judge Boasberg runs the Executive Branch and the entire judicial Branch. Since the Supreme Court already ruled that President Trump has the authority to use the Alien Act and that the courts have no jurisdiction, what is the purpose of the stay order, and what are they reviewing? If the Constitution and the Rule of Law matter, it's time for the Supreme Court to ACT TO END this overstep by the Federal judiciary. Failure to act will erode the public trust in the Constitution.

This quote by Bill Ackerman, a renowned businessman, sums up the issue well: "A nation in which one administration can allow millions of unvetted illegal migrants into the country, but requires that a court can vet each deportation decision in an individually adjudicated case will soon lose the values our democratic system was intended to preserve."

President Trump still has a role to play in this ending mess: using the law to stop the lawlessness by asking Congress to reign in these courts. It's time to end this unconstitutional ploy of judge-shopping, issuing stay orders, and conflict of interest under 28 U.S. Code § 455—Disqualification of justice, Judge, or magistrate judge of the District Court Judges involved, showing personal animus and bias.

Some of these District Court judges have a conflict-of-interest issue, showing animus toward Trump or Democratic party supporters, which needs to be addressed by the Supreme Court. It is not just a matter of legality but a fundamental issue of the balance of power in our Government.

Trump needs to have his Attorney General announce that the DOJ has opened an investigation into the "Crime of the Century," the Conspiracy to interfere in three Presidential elections, and the obstruction of the current Trump Presidency from judges with conflict of interest issues using Conspiracy Federal criminal statutes 18 USC 371, Conspiracy to defraud the American public; 18 USC 241 Conspiracy Against Rights; Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law 18 USC 242.

This will allow the DOJ to hold everyone accountable and expose the scope and extent of this Machiavellian scheme to the public and how corrupted the system has become. What's ironic is that the people calling Trump a dictator and a fascist and saying that people need to rise up and resist to save democracy are accusing Trump of what they have actually done by destroying democracy.

Unless the DOJ investigates this cabal to hold those at the highest levels of Government accountable, everyone's efforts in exposing this rot will be for naught, as those responsible will never be prosecuted for their criminal acts and the Rule of Law as we know it.

I hope the American people see the threat here to their freedoms and safety by supporting Trump's efforts to restore the public faith in the Rule of Law from the invasion of criminal gangs into the U.S.

The citation and reference section presents the evidence and prosecution theory presented in this 50-plus article series through the prism of a retired federal agent who did this for a living based on proven years of sound investigative and prosecution principles from prior conspiracy investigations that have been successfully prosecuted. ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ ⁶

References and Citations

1. PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSIAN HOAX-PART 2

2. THE BLUEPRINT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

3. RESTORING THE PUBLIC TRUST IN THE RULE OF LAW

4. MOCK GRAND JURY

5. THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM

6. U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES GONE WILD

[Note: This analysis was created by a former Retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent John Seaman with over 30 years’ experience conducting complex conspiracy investigations. Seaman is the co-author of an article Taliban Include Heroin Kingpins in Leadership - by Gretchen Peters and John Seaman - SpyTalk and author of Ideology and Political Correctness Trump Reality and reference in article The secret story of how America lost the drug war with the Taliban - POLITICOPOLITICO]